Primary use
Card changes
Deck Builder
The deck-builder workflow is meant to answer a practical question: if your current list is creating recurring problems, what should change first and why?
Primary use
Card changes
Context
Gameplay-linked
Best for
Testing and iteration
Live clip
See the page-specific live product surface in motion.
Live Product
These are the current live surfaces and plan rules that matter most.
Edit a live list, load recent decks, and run deck analysis against the cards you actually use.
Turn a prompt into a fresh deck build instead of relying only on static meta lists.
See which card levels matter most next, based on your live card collection and current decks.
Generate four no-overlap war decks inside the same workspace instead of leaving for a separate tool.
Browse account-aware ladder recommendations instead of generic decks with no player context.
Some recommendation detail gets deeper on higher tiers, especially for richer reasoning and matchup-aware guidance.
Playbook
Keep it to the core steps and product truths.
A deck recommendation is more useful when it responds to the actual problems showing up in your replays and profile, not only to the global meta.
Most players are not rebuilding from zero every day. They are trying to repair one weak lane of the deck or decide whether a favored list truly suits them.
Deck advice is most useful when it gives you a clear follow-up after a battle review. Instead of stopping at diagnosis, the deck builder helps you decide what to test next and whether your current list is still the right fit.
Proof
A few quick proof points tied to the live product.
Problem-driven suggestions
Card changes are easier to trust when they answer a specific recurring issue.
Players can test adjustments with a clear hypothesis.
Matchup-aware planning
The deck builder becomes more valuable when paired with matchup guides and profile splits.
The site can serve both tool intent and educational intent.
Useful follow-through
After a battle review, deck advice gives players an immediate structural lever to pull.
That keeps the workflow moving from diagnosis to action.
No. It is most useful when you are deciding whether your current list is holding you back and what change is most worth testing next.
Use battle reviews to confirm the kind of problem you keep seeing, then use the deck builder when that problem looks structural rather than purely mechanical.
Yes. The Free plan includes 100 battle analyses per month, 30 monthly uses for every other core feature, weekly profile refreshes, and a first-10 premium trial with the full coaching presentation unlocked.
Matchup guides
Pair deck decisions with archetype-specific plans.
Read more
Player profile
Use the profile to confirm whether the structural issue is recurring.
Read more
AI coach overview
Return to the main product story.
Read more
Sample analyses
See the review style that often leads to deck changes.
Read more